top of page
in retrospect
A brief consolidation/comparison of design iteration outcomes vs project drivers
With reference to the core drivers outlined early on, I am considering how the outcome of the iterative process undertaken during the big draw has begun to address issues.
- I considered access to building and bike parking. Therefore addressing infrastructure but not culture.
- further consideration into integration of cycling needs to go into programme
1 - Bridging the gap between cycling infrastructure and cycling culture
2 - Providing a focal point for local activity and connecting existing community assets
- haven't considered this successfully yet
- most difficult to do, but could be considered programmatically in tandem with the spatial arrangement.
3 - Creating a space for the exchange of skills, knowledge and information for the community
- perhaps the driver that has had the biggest influence on not only programme but design
- workshops and research centre, but further integration of this idea into programme could lead to greater efficacy
bottom of page